BarCampSheff: Practical Uses For Jedi Mind-Tricks

by Pippa on December 4, 2008

Or “These are not the droids you are looking for”.*

The theme for my first ever Bar Camp this past weekend in Sheffield was “community and conversation.”  Conveniently, most of the people in Sheffield I wanted to catch up with or get to know better were at Bar Camp. Even better, one of my best friends from Adelaide and another friend were down from Newcastle Upon Tyne for the weekend.

Since I was returning to a place where I’d briefly lived yet made a number of great connections, it felt fitting to run a session on friendship and how to move to a new town.

My original title for this session was going to be How to move to a new place, make friends and influence people. On arrival at Bar Camp Sheffield I realised that I wanted my session to be more than a presentation: how could I get people to turn up and talk about how we meet, become friends and influence each other? So I cunningly threw in a Star Wars related title.

My suspicions about who turns up at Bar Camps were justified! There was a crowd of geeks… Then, without notes or a sequence of events I had to run my session.

I’d initially thought about running this as a presentation complete with slides and er, planning, but I wanted to play with the unconference environment of Bar Camp and in the end settled for a more impromptu conversation-like session which I tried to direct with some questions.  I felt that it was a style of discussion that worked particularly well with the topic.

As a result, my slightly disjointed notes are from memory.  I’ve tried to record key elements of what I said, what I wish I’d said and how other people responded.  If you have a better memory and can tell me something I forgot, or have something that you wish you’d had a chance to mention on Saturday, please leave a comment below.

It was a great experience for my first ever BarCamp – I’m looking forward to seeing how future events shape up in comparison (free beer and food?!). Thanks so much to Jag, Ian, Jay and Josie for organising such a lovely weekend!


Motivation

I want to explore the nuances of friendship and the distinctions between strangers, acquaintances and friends.  I’m not yet sure whether to do this as artistic practice or to follow it academically or professionally.

Inspiration:

  • Futuresonic ’08 – Matt Jones of Dopplr “Kill ‘Friending’ and the binary recording of relationships”
    • Started me thinking about the nuances of friendship – online we click a button to say Yes, we’re friends, but how do we recognise and acknowledge friends in real life? What are the qualities we look for, how do we ‘know’ that person x is a friend?
  • James Boardwell’s talk at GeekUp Sheffield (July ’08) on “internet sensibilities: remodelling humans”.
    • A couple of slides in particular grabbed my attention – the comparison of the way teenagers record degrees of friendship. Girls did this very consciously and frequently with people they knew moving in and out of a layers / circles of friendship.
  • Moving from city to city – I’m able to socialise easily and know many people I count as friends around the world (NB: friends here implies various levels of intimacy and “bestness”). I now seem to have an innate ability to start interacting with anyone of any age – but can I do make even better connections with people?
    • When thinking of this event I was wondering what techniques other people used when interacting with others, especially in new cities with unfamiliar languages and cultural conventions.

Things I Remember Saying, Questions I Remember Asking:

  • How I became social: When I was 18 my boyfriend Ringo gave me detailed instructions on how to start talking to people. “Compliment them on their clothes, make a comment about something nearby and then ask them questions about themselves”.
  • How does one know when they are friends with someone?
    Possibly because they are traditionally associated with economic obligations, I feel that romantic relationships and business relationships have a formality associated with them that isn’t just about marriage and business contracts. First kisses and handshakes are an “informal” way of starting something.
  • Could there be a biochemical and therefore evolutionary reason for why we’re friends with some people and not with others?
    I’m particularly interested in this – how come we just don’t get on with some people who have many similarities and shared interests with us?
  • Do other people find it difficult to stop being friends with other people?
    Are friend ‘breakups’ as codified and formal as those with romantic / sexual partners or with business relationships?
  • Do friends expect certain behaviour from each other?  Eg. in a romantic relationship there’s usually many conditions – you shall not kiss / touch / flirt / have sex with another person.
    Interestingly the major problems I’ve had with friends have been when I’ve broken some type of friendship condition that I was unaware of.
  • If we can become “friends” so easily online – why are we now unable to talk with our immediate community of neighbours?
    Someone whose name I never caught mentioned that when he moved to a new house he left cards with his immediate neighbours and felt that that action actually reduced the interaction he had with them.
  • Does anyone else find public transport an amazing place to meet people?
    General consensus: Yes, but not on the Tube.  Lucy from SY was very happy to admit to being the crazy talkative lady on the bus. (Go Girl!)

I Remember Other People Talking About:

  • Guy Dickinson talked about how his grandmother had been remembered as being a good friend.  He thought it was primarily to do with the fact that she rarely talked – most of the time she was listening to other people.
  • GD – very conscious use of “social skills” (i.e. that done by salespeople) would often put him off talking to them.
  • GD – Fine line between Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) and people who are naturally good at interaction and who make eye contact, ask questions etc without it being an act.  (further reading: The Game by Neil Strauss)
  • GD – Differences in business behaviour across cultures eg. US far more overtly “networked” with cards and working out who was known in common. In France meetings more likely to start with general conversation so that those involved had developed some deeper connection than just business.
  • Dan Donald – talked about how there are layers of friendship. Some people you can see once every couple of years and still be amazingly close. Other people can be around you every day but still not be a friend.
  • DD – mentioned the book The Politics of Experience by RD Laing and in particular how it discusses the ways we interact with other people.
  • Social Networking
    Inevitably this discussion turned away from traditional friendship and mutated into a talk about social networks and online reputations.

    • GD – had for a while made sure he was the only Guy Dickinson up the top of Google.
      Also he felt that his daughter used Bebo in a different way to Facebook as she was ‘friends’ with him on one social network and not the other.
    • Emma Persky spoke at length about how she uses different social networks depending on how she knows people.
      She uses Linked In to manage connections with people she knows professionally and from conferences and  Facebook for connections with ‘real’ friends. Uses Twitter to follow anyone she’s interested in regardless of whether they’ve met before.
      Has two business cards – a professional one courtesy of her employer and a personal Moo card.
      Interestingly she’s happy to share a lot of personal details such as address via the web implying a large amount of trust in social networks.
  • Lucy and Emma from Screen Yorkshire were also active participants, especially about offline relationships.
  • Lucy mentioned that she has can maintain a limited number of friends.
    This led to talking about the Dunbar’s Number and whether it had changed, relative to the speed with which we can keep in contact with people.
  • The reference to Dunbar’s Number also tied in with Malcolm Gladwell’s book “The Tipping Point”

Things I wish I’d mentioned

  • I still feel guilty if I give someone “best friend” status – it’s like I take the word very literally and can only have one very close friend at any one time. Taking the Dunbar Number and limits of socialising into consideration, is it possible to have many very close and good friends?
  • Love / Hate lists in primary school. Way back before social networks or even the web existed my school friends and I used to keep lists of who we liked and who were our sworn enemies and would move them in and out as they changed status.
  • I really like how Flickr connections are recorded by default as ‘contacts’ and that being recorded as a friend or family requires a separate click.
    For a while Facebook made it compulsory to list how you knew someone and that had to be confirmed by the other person. Did this classification of ‘friend’ annoy people?
  • Learning how to talk to dogs in different languages is important – it’s a great way of meeting people.
    • For the record the German for ‘sit’ is sitz and in Finnish it’s istu - Can you help me out with any other languages?

Further Reading:


* Apologies to anyone who did turn up to my session expecting more than one Star Wars reference – the smart ones of you will have noticed that the titling of my session was an actual mind-trick which got people into Bar Camp Sheffield’s Open Space.

UPDATES:

  • I recently spoke with someone about this topic and they mentioned that children are always actively making and breaking up with their friends. The woman I was speaking with had worked in a primary school and had noticed that as children they were very contract-minded about why they would stop being friends with each other. eg. “Mark wouldn’t share his candy with me! He’s my best friend and best friends always share candy.”
    Why and when does this outlining of what you expect from your friends become more unspoken?
  • I’ve also just read the most amazing article which references a book called Friendship Processes by Beverley Fehr:

    With intriguing accuracy, sociologists and psychologists have delineated the forces that attract and bind friends to each other, beginning with the transition from acquaintanceship to friendship. They’ve traced the patterns of intimacy that emerge between friends and deduced the once ineffable “something” that elevates a friend to the vaunted status of “best.”

    Friendship: The Laws of Attraction, Why Some (And Only Some) Friends Stick

  • I’m still overwhelmed by how many people I’d met in the three months I spent living in Sheffield and how enjoyable it was to catch up with them as well as meet new people at BarCamp.
    Revisiting Sheffield has really helped to reassure me that I’ll make as good a circle of friends in Berlin given enough time. I’ll report back on my progress at BarCampSheff 3.0!

< !– Start of StatCounter Code –>

”web


< !– End of StatCounter Code –>

Share

11 comments

Hi Pippa,

I wish I’d caught your session now. It sounded really interesting!

Not sure if you know abou the Microformat XFN (XHTML Friends Network) where you add extra attributes to a hyperlink to indicate your relationship with people – eg, rel=”friend met” or rel=”co-worker” etc? More reading here if you’re interested.

Well, there was also a spoof version proposed called XEN (for enemies), which I was reminded of with your friends/enemies list from school. The one I particularly liked was rel=”nemsis” – Dr Horrible and Captain Hammer, perhaps? ;-)

Hope to see you again,

Caz

by Caz Mockett on December 4, 2008 at 8:50 pm. Reply #

Hi,

This was my first ever barcamp session, so I will always think of it fondly.

On this subject, I’m struggling with the idea of adding people who I met a barcamp’s blogs to my friends folder in my blogroll, is this premature? Or merely the way we use friend online?

Marc

by Marc Johnson on December 4, 2008 at 10:39 pm. Reply #

Pip, as you know I’m in the US.

A current part of my research in on the what we call the “friend graph” which is an abstract representation of an Online Social Network, users are nodes and they have an edge between them if they’re “friends”. The reason I make comment: one of the topics I have spent many hours discussing with people is how we give more meaning to the “distance” or “weight” of an edge connecting two nodes. What I want is to find ways of accessing the strength of a relationship given amount the connection is used. Of course I’m looking at clustering and trying to simplify the graph by turning clusters into “super-nodes”.

I think this is relevant because if two people are “close” friends intuition would suggest that more information is likely to pass between them and the less tow people know each other the amount passing declines. Of course there is counter example, I, for instance, hassle people online more than most.

Anyway, thought you might find that interesting. Your session sounds like it was very interesting and nicely interactive.

Cheers, ross

by Ross on December 5, 2008 at 7:55 am. Reply #

Wotcher Pip, great writeup, and a brill session, thanks for running it (Even if you did manage to leave all the other sessions with only 12 people between them).

I have a distinct recollection of being used as an example when trying to find out who’s mobile phone I was holding. Something about just using it as a business transaction instead of getting to know the individual involved. I’ll try much harder next time :)

Hope you’re settled in at home again.

e.

by Ianibbo on December 5, 2008 at 1:43 pm. Reply #

[...] writeup of her Jedi Mind Tricks (Influencing people) talk Marc Johnson’s barcampsheff blog post Caz Mockett’s barcampsheff blog post The [...]

by crossedstreams.com » Blog Archive » BarCamp Sheffield Diary: Sunday on December 5, 2008 at 1:52 pm. Reply #

Of course, then there are these kind of friends:
http://xkcd.com/513/

I totally forgot to ask questions about the lines between friendship and relationships.

Maybe I should run a FriendCamp?

by Pippa on December 5, 2008 at 5:39 pm. Reply #

Out of all the talks at Barcamp, i thought this was the best. It felt impromptu and consequently developed into a nice free-form discussion about friendship and social networking. Which is exactly the sort of thing i expected from a session. Great!

I have to give credit to Guy Dickinson though, as he pretty much summed up what LinkedIn was about. I myself had used the service before, but i didn’t really fully understand it. Now i do.

I was also glad to meet someone with a similar dislike of sales people. So thanks Guy!

And of course, thanks to you Pip for running the session. It’s not every day that you get to hear people talk about concepts like the Dunbar Number and how socialising really works.

by James on December 5, 2008 at 9:04 pm. Reply #

Nice writeup – it was almost like being there! (I had a clash in the schedule with the ruby_gem’s Agile talk)

Interesting how your talk has continued on your blog – friends networks in action :)

Look forward to Jedi Mind Tricks II at the next barcampsheff (hint, hint)

by brabster on December 6, 2008 at 1:21 pm. Reply #

[...] starting off my list of 150 Things with Practical Uses For Jedi Mind-Tricks, the session I ran at BarCamp Sheffield at the beginning of December last [...]

by Fighting Tiger » Blog Archive » 150 Things : 1.0 Practical Uses For Jedi Mind-Tricks on January 12, 2009 at 2:06 am. Reply #

Re: the notion of friendship break-ups.

I totally think that friendship break-ups are real. I find from experience in my own friendships and from those I have observed, that friendship break-ups are down to differences in perception of what the friendship contract actually constitutes. I mean, if you really think about it this is very easy to do because nobody actually drafts out a friendship contract and the nature of the friendship and its functional/transactional value is ambiguous; often both parties have different expectations and values.

I do think that real (that is face-to-face) friendships are more sad to lose – and certainly cause a lot of anger. Among adults, because we often believe ourselves to be above trivial, irrational feelings, we feel that our anger is justified. And thus, I would say, that adult friendships are more difficult to repair. It can be very similar to a relationship break-up in my opinion.

A friend of mine once recommended The Joke by Kafka because it touches on these themes, apparently (but I am yet to read it).

by Marc Jones on January 12, 2009 at 3:16 am. Reply #

Came over to here from your link on the 150 Things topic. Awesome way to start!

There’s a book of personal essays about friend-breakups; I’ll look up the info for you, if you’re interested. Just as Marc Jones says above, lots of people who wrote experienced the loss as deeply as a “relationship” breakup (aren’t friendships relationships?).

Talking to dogs! I cracked up friends in Muelheim when I asked, “Der Hund spricht nur Deutsch?” They said yes, so I started to say to the dog, “Du bist…” and then I asked them, “so what do you *say* to dogs in German?” It turns out you say, “Du bist ein fein Hund!” while scritching them behind the ears. :)

I have more thoughts, but maybe this enough for now!

by Rose White on January 13, 2009 at 2:49 am. Reply #

Leave your comment

Required.

Required. Not published.

If you have one.